Home
About Us
Membership
Adopt A Pet
Foster A Pet
Adopted Pets
Lost and Found
Events
Volunteer
Success Stories
Donate
Special Thanks
Memorials
Information
Applications
Links
Contact Us

|
|
Letter
To Editor
This is
a letter that was written to the editor of the Jacksonville Daily News
regarding a proposed assessment on pet food.
To the
Editor:
Your
editorial on the miniscule pet food assessment (or tax, as you call it)
proposed by the NC legislature missed one very, very important detail -
North Carolina taxpayers are ALREADY paying ridiculous amounts for animal
"control" that doesn't control anything, including the
ever-increasing costs involved. Euthanasia-based animal control as
it is practiced across NC is incredibly expensive and for all the money it
costs us, IT DOESN'T EVEN WORK!
Thousands
more animals are born every year and thousands more are rounded up and
killed at taxpayer expense, and the tax burden this perpetuates is insane
- over $25 MILLION spent each year according to the NC Dept. of Health and
Human Services!
THIS is what
the Daily News should be writing about. This and the fact that in
2001 and 2002 Onslow County taxpayers, for example, paid $822,454 to trap,
transport, house and sort 14,526 abandoned cats & dogs, eventually
killing 9,919 of them. 7,651 more cats and dogs were left at the
Onslow shelter in 2003. We leave you to imagine at what cost.
When a simple
44 cents to a few bucks per year in additional pet food costs can raise
$4-8 million/year to bring affordable spay-neuter surgeries to those who
need it, saving taxpayers many times that amount over time, the
Jacksonville Daily News should have been urging its readers to READ and
support the proposed bill. It would have given Onlsow, Craven and
Carteret County each many tens of thousands of dollars/year in spay-neuter
funds, and the Onlsow, Carteret and Craven shelters could have received up
to $25,000/year each in shelter-improvement grants.
Euthanasia-based
animal control as it is being practiced across North Carolina is nothing
but a taxpayer-financed welfare program for irresponsible pet owners, and
we ALL pay for it! Irresponsible pet owners have litter after little
and dump innocent animals at the shelters, and pet owning and non-pet
owning taxpayers pay for it. Irresponsible pet owners let their
hormone-driven animals roam unsupervised, and, yes, all the taxpayers pay
for it. The nastiest of these people abuse and fight their animals,
and who pays to clean this up? Again, the taxpayers.
Well, its
time for a change, and I applaud anyone willing to help make it
happen. National studies have proven: for every municipal
dollar spent on targeted spay-neuter, 3-4 tax dollars are saved in animal
control costs.
To those of
you who protested the proposed bill, did you read even a single one of its
21 pages? Or did you fall for the sound-bites of special interest
groups willfully distorting the facts to support their personal objectives
at the cost of the general taxpayer? Well, folks, ignorance is NOT
bills. Ignorance is pretty stupid, actually. It is also very,
very expensive. Not all "taxes" are created equal.
Some, like this one, would actually save large amounts of taxpayer money
in only a matter of a few years. Without, you're all going to
CONTINUE to pay.
TWO TAX
WATCHDOGS WHO ARE NOT WAGGING THEIR TAILS
|